Kohima: Prof. Shantanu Chakravarty of Assam’s Girijananda Chowdhury University says the Bengal Eastern Frontier Regulation of 1873 remains a pillar of Indian democracy. He presented these findings at a national seminar hosted by the Inner Line Regulation Commission and Naga Students’ Federation in Dimapur on August 28 and 29.
Chakravarty rejected claims that the permit system acts as a constitutional anomaly. He instead framed it as a necessary safeguard for indigenous groups. Integrationists often argue the regulation hurts economic growth and violates fundamental rights. Conversely, advocates say unchecked migration destroys local identity. "This demographic and cultural vulnerability is not theoretical; it is an active reality experienced across the North-East, including in my home state of Assam," Chakravarty noted.
The regulation originated under British rule to secure revenue and administrative control. Critics point to this colonial history, but Chakravarty dismissed such objections. Under Article 372, pre-existing laws hold force until a legislature chooses to change them. He highlighted Article 371A as a critical shield for Naga religion, social practices, and land ownership. For tribes, he argued, land is not just a commodity but a base for survival.
He warned that rising demographic anxieties in regions like Tripura and Assam have fueled calls for similar permit regimes. To resolve this, he proposed a governance model built on three pillars. These include protecting indigenous land, simplifying permit access for legitimate business, and maintaining strict judicial oversight. He believes this framework protects frontier identities while keeping the nation integrated.
Comments