Tripura High Court Overturns Magistrate Order Under New Criminal Law

Photo Courtesy: tripuratimes

Agartala: The Tripura High Court tossed a Chief Judicial Magistrate order on September 7. Justice Biswajit Palit ruled the court failed to follow new procedural rules under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The judge declared the lower court's actions illegal.

The case started July 12, 2024. Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd filed a complaint against Dipankar Majumder and Maitri Majumder under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The CJM in West Tripura took cognisance of the complaint immediately. The magistrate skipped the mandatory step of hearing the accused. He then moved the case to another court the same day.

Section 223 of the BNSS changed the game. It demands that magistrates hear the accused before taking cognisance of an offence. Justice Palit stated, "so, an order passed on any complaint after 01.07.2024 directly taking cognisance of any offence without hearing the accused would amount to bad in law and also abuse of the process of the Court and without jurisdiction."

Prosecutors tried to save the order. They claimed no witnesses were examined and no harm was done. The High Court rejected this defense. It found that the new law explicitly forces a pre-cognisance hearing. The High Court set aside the original order and sent the case back for a do-over. Both parties must report to the CJM, West Tripura, on September 22, 2026. High Court officials will now circulate this ruling to all criminal courts across the state to ensure future compliance.

Disclaimer: The views and facts expressed here are solely those of the independent citizen journalist, researcher, and others, who assumes full responsibility for the content's accuracy and legality. Any third-party media (images, videos, or audio) used belongs to its respective owners and is shared strictly for reporting, criticism, or review under the "Fair Dealing" provisions of Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (India). NEWire.in does not claim ownership over such material and reserves the right to review, moderate, or remove content at its sole discretion upon receiving valid legal concerns or grievances.

Comments
Please login to comment.