Sikkim High Court Pauses Electoral Roll Petition Pending Supreme Court Ruling

Photo Courtesy: nenow

Gangtok: The Sikkim High Court has suspended proceedings on a petition challenging the current Special Intensive Revision of electoral rolls. A division bench led by Chief Justice A. Muhamed Mustaque and Justice Bhaskar Raj Pradhan determined that it would be inappropriate to rule on the matter while the Supreme Court is already evaluating similar issues.

The court advised the petitioner to either take the case directly to the Supreme Court or request a formal transfer of the litigation. As a result, the hearing has been adjourned sine die. The Sikkimese Moolniwasi Suraksha Sangh, which filed the Public Interest Litigation, is now expected to approach the apex court after finalizing its legal strategy.

The organization emphasized that its goal is not to stop the revision process entirely. Instead, the group is seeking greater transparency and specific safeguards to protect the interests of Sikkim indigenous communities. The group stated, "The organisation has clarified that it is not seeking to halt the SIR exercise but wants safeguards to ensure transparency and fairness throughout the process."

Key concerns raised in the petition include the criteria for voter eligibility and the specific cut off year used during the revision. The organization argues that these issues require careful review to ensure they align with the protections guaranteed under Article 371F of the Constitution.

Disclaimer: The views and facts expressed here are solely those of the independent citizen journalist, researcher, and others, who assumes full responsibility for the content's accuracy and legality. Any third-party media (images, videos, or audio) used belongs to its respective owners and is shared strictly for reporting, criticism, or review under the "Fair Dealing" provisions of Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (India). NEWire.in does not claim ownership over such material and reserves the right to review, moderate, or remove content at its sole discretion upon receiving valid legal concerns or grievances.

Comments
Please login to comment.

Related Reports