Tripura High Court Orders TET Results Update After Marking Dispute

Photo Courtesy: tripuratimes

Agartala: The High Court of Tripura ordered the Teachers Recruitment Board, Tripura to grant one extra mark to candidate Rupak Majumder. Justice Biswajit Palit issued the ruling after the petitioner challenged the grading of his 2024 T-TET Paper-I exam. He initially scored 89, missing the qualification threshold by a single point.

The legal dispute focused on a question regarding the Anarchic theory of intelligence. Majumder chose group factor theory as his answer. The board gave him zero points, claiming their three-member Expert Committee decided none of the above was the correct option. Officials also noted the petitioner missed the May 2025 deadline to protest the tentative answer key.

The court rejected these arguments. Justice Palit pointed out that the same question appeared on the 2022 exam, where the board officially marked group factor theory as correct. The board never retracted that decision. The court cited the principle of estoppels to prevent the board from changing its stance to hurt a student. Citing a similar August 21, 2026 ruling, the court found the board failed to provide evidence for its new answer. Justice Palit stated, "the action of the board was not permissible in the eyes of the law."

The board must now recalculate the results for Majumder. They have two months to finish the task. Representatives for the recruitment board did not say if they will file an appeal.

Disclaimer: The views and facts expressed here are solely those of the independent citizen journalist, researcher, and others, who assumes full responsibility for the content's accuracy and legality. Any third-party media (images, videos, or audio) used belongs to its respective owners and is shared strictly for reporting, criticism, or review under the "Fair Dealing" provisions of Section 52 of the Copyright Act, 1957 (India). NEWire.in does not claim ownership over such material and reserves the right to review, moderate, or remove content at its sole discretion upon receiving valid legal concerns or grievances.

Comments
Please login to comment.